Tourists are reported not to need an HIV test, but entry/removal advice conflicts. Absence of screening is not evidence that a legal restriction does not apply.
Source ↗Ordinary tourism; airport transit and visa extensions may have different rules. This is HIV-specific information, not a visa or overall safety assessment.
Personal accounts, not verified rules. One trip does not predict what will happen on yours.
A commenter reports travelling frequently to both destinations with medication and a prescription, without being stopped.
Read the original discussionA reply in a wider discussion; exact passports, visa routes and visit dates are not verified.
Profile retrieved 2026-10-11. Positive Destinations marks its profile updated Jul 2026. Its underlying sources have not all been independently rechecked.
Missing evidence does not prove non-enforcement. Government advisories may have nationality-specific scope. Personal accounts remain separate from policy evidence.
Suggest a correction →Contributions appear after review and permission to publish. A display name is optional.
Loading contributions…